<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wheaties bookmarks for April 22nd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wesabe.com/2007/04/22/wheaties-bookmarks-for-april-22nd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wesabe.com/2007/04/22/wheaties-bookmarks-for-april-22nd/</link>
	<description>The Wesabe blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Daly</title>
		<link>http://blog.wesabe.com/2007/04/22/wheaties-bookmarks-for-april-22nd/#comment-3931</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wesabe.com/index.php/2007/04/22/wheaties-bookmarks-for-april-22nd/#comment-3931</guid>
		<description>In response to your comment on my blog: that is exactly what I&#039;m looking forward to. Your fear of losing people to complexity may be able to be solved by a feature that Money uses - I think its called Enhanced and Basic. When people use Wesabe they could choose between the simple version and the one with all the features. This way people know what they&#039;re getting into.

Even if that wasn&#039;t offered though, I still think for Wesabe to become a service I depend on it needs more. Right now it seems that the offerings are good and useful but aren&#039;t necessary. Certainly with your platform you could have some necessary features - things I couldn&#039;t do without (i.e. everything Money and Quicken do...but better of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to your comment on my blog: that is exactly what I&#8217;m looking forward to. Your fear of losing people to complexity may be able to be solved by a feature that Money uses &#8211; I think its called Enhanced and Basic. When people use Wesabe they could choose between the simple version and the one with all the features. This way people know what they&#8217;re getting into.</p>
<p>Even if that wasn&#8217;t offered though, I still think for Wesabe to become a service I depend on it needs more. Right now it seems that the offerings are good and useful but aren&#8217;t necessary. Certainly with your platform you could have some necessary features &#8211; things I couldn&#8217;t do without (i.e. everything Money and Quicken do&#8230;but better of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
